🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.