🔗 Share this article Should We Are Witnessing the Downfall of the Movement of Attacking Play, Let’s Enjoy What It Created. The Journey of a Movement can be marked by clear stages. 1. The Core Concept A dominant personality or coaches propose an innovative concept offering a cure for struggling players. So here we are. Plans are in motion to storm the compound overseas. The gunships are circling. Smoke is rising from the sidelines. One individual, vulnerable, nervous, the phrase ATTACKING MINDSET written on his body as a symbol, has come staggering through the lines and is taken aside in secrecy towards an inconclusive loan stint in county cricket. Remember the beginning, when everything was fresh? The initial phase, of Bazball without brains. 2. Initial Adoration Cult leaders guarantee a fresh beginning, hope for a future, camaraderie, redemption within a community who all believe in the big idea. How did it feel at first? Just men on a balcony enjoying success. Ink. Forearms. Jawlines. Peak performance vibes. Admittedly, England’s players often say they don’t use the label, ironically as it’s denied, what exactly did I just watch? But we know the concept. It’s the player playing a shot so unconventional it’s beyond belief. It’s the adrenaline of Ben Stokes in ultimate mode, a look that says: thoughtful warrior, beard made of wood, natural look, genuinely raw you wouldn’t be surprised to glance over and find him positioned at mid-off bare-chested holding a fish. It’s the opener still being allowed to talk in press conferences, appearing as a happy little woodland creature smartly dressed, saying stuff like we are actively deconstructing the orange. And yes, the atmosphere, for quite a long time, was uplifting. 3. The Growth Phase Building period. Unity enforced by rote learning of key phrases. These ideas can appear contradictory as a test of “true belief”. Does anyone else feel? The backlash, the outrage, the sense of betrayal after the first Ashes Test defeat feels overblown, too much. England batted badly on the field, as history shows. They were torn apart while bowling during a brief period as the bowling and captaincy fell apart, manipulated by the batsman imitating their style effectively, adaptive to conditions, a man playing with aura. Currently, we see the pile-on, the anger, the sense of English Test cricket as a failure. The feeling seems to be that defeat must be total, they must be humbled, to be purged, obliterated, overwhelmed through sheer skill of Mitchell Starc’s movements, the conventional tactics of the bowler, out there celebrating successes modestly as if receiving a pleasant gift. What will this do to them? 4. External Conflict Challenges surface because of mistakes. But the cult cannot admit errors. It begins to thrive on hostility externally. Ultimately, approaching from the second Test, we are at a delicious point of tension in the story of this movement. England could quite easily win in Brisbane with bold tactics. Probably, they could lose just as quickly. In case of defeat it seems we may see the final stage. Prior to that, a couple of points to consider about this. Previously, back in those heady early days, of passion and hope, a column appeared suggesting Bazball was a cult. Criticism followed, which demonstrated as it’s known how to confirm something definitely isn’t a cult is should followers react defensively denying scrutiny of its truths. The developments recently are fascinating. Criticism of the approach has turned into a movement. We have a uniformly angry internet, critical analysts, images of frustrated supporters abroad missing out on play, reminiscent of people wanting fairness. Meanwhile, we have the wider backdrop of the host’s complex ingrained annoyance with the aggressive tourists, out there saying, your cherished traditions and have fostered and nurtured as part of your identity culturally from us, well, it’s all a bit of a gag after all. And this is the real point. Everything is a cult. The approach was a phenomenon because cricket is a cult. Or rather, English cricket has always been a cult, a circle, an elite gathering, an insular community with two hundred years of ceremonial past defining it. This has always been where entry is limited. It’s the imperial sport of the nation, the pioneering brand. And guess what, the country is a phenomenon, a structure of hidden ranks, a place that literally still has a king. The players have been isolated in this environment from a young age. Attempting to break free, to foster positivity, they are simply replicating their upbringing, forming a new circle, an exclusive group, but doing it this time with 15 cool guys and a coach encouraging individuality provided you conform. Stay present. Confront risks. Despite efforts, you remain stuck. Reflecting on this, it is perhaps the moment to show understanding for the approach, to recognize its positives, of which there are many. What does it represent? Promoting liberation. Defying norms. Batting aggressively|Attacking with